Powered By Blogger

Wednesday, 18 February 2015

The Evolution of the World Wide Web: From Web 1.0 to Web 4.0: A Synopsis


The original article is the collaborative work of three Academics (all of the Computer Engineering Department of the University of Isfahan, Iran). Aghaei, S., Nematbakhsh, M. A. and Farsani, H. K. endeavoured in this paper to present the evolutionary trajectory of the World Wide Web from its beginning as Web 1.0 to Web 4.0.
Their work as it appeared in the International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology (IJWesT) Vol 3, No. 1. January 2012 is here summerised.
            The work began with an introduction. Presenting what the Web is, in an attempt to properly situate the subject matter amongst the variegated Internet family. They made a strong emphasis on the position of the Web: its prominence amongst the parts that make up, but not wholly all there is to the Internet.  At its creation in 1989, the web - as a cognitive or taught tool (Web 1.0), it has witnessed a lot of transformation to a tool and medium of communication (Web 2.0), as a net-worked digital cooperative tool (Web 3.0), and to an integrative tool as its seen in Web 4.0.
            Through these four generations of the Web, a clear pattern of increasing complexity and use has been the history and hallmark of the Web.

Web 1.0
            Beginning 1089 as Tim Burner-Lee’s project to create a common information space where people through networked computers could communicate by use of a Universal Document Identifier (UDI), providing a read-only Web. It employed the use of static HTMLpages that were regularly updated providing text-based information that made linking weak. Its protocols were the HTTP, HTML and the URL.

Web 2.0
            Came 2004 and Dale Dougherty advanced the process to what he described as Web 2.0. In his words, it was the “… the business revolution … caused by the moved to the internet platform… build applications that harness network effects…”
            Working the faults of of its predecessor (Web1.0), it sought to make people the hub that drive its improvement, i.e. it gave people more interactivity over and against less control by the Web. This was in essence the result of incorporating “flexible  web designs, creative reuse, updates and collaborative content creation”. It also included blogs, RSS feeds, wikis, mashups, tags, folksonomy, tag clouds and social networking tools. These were made possible by the development of several tools like the asynchronous JavaScript, XML (AJAX), Flex as well as Google Web tool kit. These features and tools made the adoption of Web 2.0 more acceptable.

Web 3.0
            This improvement of the Web, evolved from the need to link defined web structures for animation and reuse in other applications. Its aptly described as a semantic web due to its ability to demonstrate things in a manner understandable, readable and useable by the computer and machines.
            Web 3.0 essentially acts like a ‘large doc store’ of sorts in which all files within the doc store are linked to each other. The basic layers of this sematic doc-store-like web are; Unicode and URL, XML, Resonance Description Framework (RDF), RDF schema, Ontology, Logic and Proof and Trust.

Web 4.0
            This version of the web, also known as WebOS, was “still an … idea in progress” as at the time of the authors presented their work. Described as a symbiotic web, its difference from its preceding concept was to allow a kind of a two-way relationship between computers and human. It also allows for the building of mind control interphase between the computer and man.
            Its compelling power was how it enables a rich participation in online networks ensuring global transparency, governance, distribution and collaborations.
            The Web 4.0 tends towards achieving a mind of its own.

Conclusions

            The paper succeeded in explaining the evolutionary history of the web through its first four generations, with detailed differences between the generations.  It advanced the need for further work on the broader research on the semantic web and its issues.

2 comments:

  1. Hahahaha. Thanks for reading, but why dress me in borrowed & oversized robes? ;)

    ReplyDelete